Menu Close

What 2 points of view of the presidency were debated by the framers?

What 2 points of view of the presidency were debated by the framers?

Boiling all this down, the two general voting blocs among the framers were those who wanted a strong independent and nimble executive and those who feared they were creating another monarchy.

Why did the framers curtail the president’s powers?

The framers of the Constitution were wary of executive power because they saw it as the most likely source of tyranny. As they wrote the Constitution, the framers decided not to provide great detail about the president. Instead, the framers gave the office only a few specific powers.

What led Dickerson to his thesis that the presidency is broken?

What led Dickerson to his thesis that the presidency is broken? It was overly busy and required the president to assume many different roles.

How did the Reorganization Act of 1939 affect the office of the presidency quizlet?

As President Roosevelt said, more and more government departments were created, and it was the president’s job to oversee those departments. The Reorganization Act gave the president more power by providing him with a support staff and advisers to help him.

Why did the framers of the Constitution want a strong president?

As they wrote the Constitution, the framers decided not to provide great detail about the president. Instead, the framers gave the office only a few specific powers. They wanted a strong executive who could deal with emergencies, particularly those involving other nations, but who would not dominate the U.S. government.

Why did the framers think the Bill of Rights was pointless?

When proponents of the original Constitution argued in 1789 that a bill of rights would be pointless because political majorities would run roughshod over its guarantees, Thomas Jefferson responded that this argument ignored “the legal check” that could be exercised by the judiciary.

What was the original plan of the framers?

The original version of the electoral col- legeworked asthe Framers intended only aslong as George Washington was willing to seek and hold the presidency. He did so twice, and was unanimously elected President, in 1789 and ‘\\ again in 1792. Flaws began to appear in the system in 1796, however, with the rise of political parties.

Why was Marshall’s interpretation important to the framers?

Marshall’s interpretative understanding reflects an approach that is true to what we might call “The Framers’ Constitution.” It recognizes that the Constitution sets forth broad principles and that the central challenge of constitutional interpretation is to define and then give life and substance to those principles in an ever-changing society.